Comparisons CheckVibe
CheckVibe alternative — breadth of checks vs. depth in one stack
CheckVibe is a hosted scanner for vibe-coded web apps. It works from the deployed URL and bundles three families of checks in one report: over a hundred security checks, 68 SEO checks and 46 AEO checks, plus dependency scanning of the JavaScript it finds in your bundle. It has an API, an MCP server, white-labelled PDF reports for agencies passing results to clients, and a beta authenticated-scanning mode. Like the rest of this category it does not connect to a repository — everything it knows comes from what your server hands to a visitor.
Where CheckVibe wins
If you are an agency, CheckVibe is probably the better buy and it is not close. A white-labelled PDF you can put your own logo on and hand to a client is a deliverable; our result page is not, and we have said elsewhere that PDF reporting is deliberately out of scope. They also cover dependency scanning, SEO and AEO, none of which we do or intend to.
Side by side
| CheckVibe | Sentris | |
|---|---|---|
| Reads your repository | — no | ■ yes |
| Total checks advertised | ■ yes | — no |
| SEO and AEO checks | ■ yes | — no |
| Dependency scanning | ■ yes | — no |
| White-label PDF reports | ■ yes | — no |
| Public API | ■ yes | ◧ partly |
| MCP server | ■ yes | ■ yes |
| Tables shipping without RLS, read from your migrations | — no | ■ yes |
| Routes taking a caller-supplied id with no auth check | — no | ■ yes |
| Entry price | — no | ■ yes |
| Price | $24 / $49 / $99 per month | Free to scan; $19 / $49 / $99 per month |
Prices checked 30 July 2026 against each vendor's public pricing page. Check theirs before deciding — ours is on this page.
Choose CheckVibe if
- You are an agency and the report itself is the deliverable — white-labelled, PDF, client-ready.
- You want SEO and AEO checks in the same pass and the same invoice.
- You want dependency scanning included rather than declared out of scope.
- You need a broad sweep across many client sites, not depth on one stack.
- Your clients are not on Supabase.
Choose Sentris if
- Your access control lives in RLS policies and SQL migrations, which no URL scanner reads.
- You would rather have nine checks you can trace to a line of your code than two hundred you have to triage.
- You want the scan to run before deploy, against the branch.
- You want to see your exposure count before creating an account or entering a card.
- Signal-to-noise matters more to you than check count.
Questions
CheckVibe runs 200+ checks and Sentris runs nine. Why so few?
Because every check we ship has to pass a clean-repository gate first: a deliberately correct repo must produce zero findings before a rule is allowed to exist. That is a slow way to add checks and a fast way to keep a report worth reading. Their number also counts SEO and AEO checks, which are not security by any definition either of us would use.
Do they read source code?
No. CheckVibe scans the deployed URL. Their dependency scanning reads the JavaScript bundles your site serves, which is a real capability, but it is not repository access — a file that never reaches the browser is invisible to it.
Can I get a PDF out of Sentris?
No, and it is not planned. PDF reporting is on our explicit out-of-scope list because it serves a different buyer with a different sales cycle. If a client-ready document is what you need, CheckVibe built for that and we did not.
One number nobody else on this list publishes
False-positive floods are the standing complaint about this whole category, and not one tool in it states its rate. Ours is precision 1.000, recall 1.000 over 24 planted findings in 9 repositories — with the date, the commit, the scoring rules and the command that reproduces it, plus a paragraph on why 9 repositories is a small corpus. Measured 2026-08-11.
Find out in about a minute.
A scan needs no account and no card. You see how many exposures you have before you decide whether any of this comparison matters.
Scan my app